http://www.venganza.org/
I am writing you with much concern after having read of your hearing to decide whether the alternative theory of Intelligent Design should be taught along with the theory of Evolution. I think we can all agree that it is important for students to hear multiple viewpoints so they can choose for themselves the theory that makes the most sense to them. I am concerned, however, that students will only hear one theory of Intelligent Design.
Let us remember that there are multiple theories of Intelligent Design. I and many others around the world are of the strong belief that the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster. It was He who created all that we see and all that we feel. We feel strongly that the overwhelming scientific evidence pointing towards evolutionary processes is nothing but a coincidence, put in place by Him.
It is for this reason that I’m writing you today, to formally request that this alternative theory be taught in your schools, along with the other two theories. In fact, I will go so far as to say, if you do not agree to do this, we will be forced to proceed with legal action. I’m sure you see where we are coming from. If the Intelligent Design theory is not based on faith, but instead another scientific theory, as is claimed, then you must also allow our theory to be taught, as it is also based on science, not on faith.
Some find that hard to believe, so it may be helpful to tell you a little more about our beliefs. We have evidence that a Flying Spaghetti Monster created the universe. None of us, of course, were around to see it, but we have written accounts of it. We have several lengthy volumes explaining all details of His power. Also, you may be surprised to hear that there are over 10 million of us, and growing. We tend to be very secretive, as many people claim our beliefs are not substantiated by observable evidence. What these people don’t understand is that He built the world to make us think the earth is older than it really is. For example, a scientist may perform a carbon-dating process on an artifact. He finds that approximately 75% of the Carbon-14 has decayed by electron emission to Nitrogen-14, and infers that this artifact is approximately 10,000 years old, as the half-life of Carbon-14 appears to be 5,730 years. But what our scientist does not realize is that every time he makes a measurement, the Flying Spaghetti Monster is there changing the results with His Noodly Appendage. We have numerous texts that describe in detail how this can be possible and the reasons why He does this. He is of course invisible and can pass through normal matter with ease.
I’m sure you now realize how important it is that your students are taught this alternate theory. It is absolutely imperative that they realize that observable evidence is at the discretion of a Flying Spaghetti Monster. Furthermore, it is disrespectful to teach our beliefs without wearing His chosen outfit, which of course is full pirate regalia. I cannot stress the importance of this enough, and unfortunately cannot describe in detail why this must be done as I fear this letter is already becoming too long. The concise explanation is that He becomes angry if we don’t.
You may be interested to know that global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking numbers of Pirates since the 1800s. For your interest, I have included a graph of the approximate number of pirates versus the average global temperature over the last 200 years. As you can see, there is a statistically significant inverse relationship between pirates and global temperature.
In conclusion, thank you for taking the time to hear our views and beliefs. I hope I was able to convey the importance of teaching this theory to your students. We will of course be able to train the teachers in this alternate theory. I am eagerly awaiting your response, and hope dearly that no legal action will need to be taken. I think we can all look forward to the time when these three theories are given equal time in our science classrooms across the country, and eventually the world; One third time for Intelligent Design, one third time for Flying Spaghetti Monsterism, and one third time for logical conjecture based on overwhelming observable evidence.
Sincerely Yours,
Bobby Henderson, concerned citizen.
P.S. I have included an artistic drawing of Him creating a mountain, trees, and a midget. Remember, we are all His creatures.
http://www.venganza.org/about/open-letter/
I should suppor The Flying Kosah Me7shi Monster...
maz_java wrote:
Jedidiah777 wrote:Hmm, if they would try to understand, there is nothing wrong with it! But they are claiming to understand it and force their doctrine on our children. That’s a whole different story!
Jedidiah777 wrote:I never heard or read about any evidence of this theory. (see, here is just a claim) The theory is only solid in their mind…
hehe
sorry to interfere but I must say something here
there are like millions of really strong scientific evidences to support evolution, but not a single scientific evidence to say anything about creation.... moreover.... evolution explains like 99.99% of everything, while creation explains absolutely nothing.... ie: 0%!!!
the problem is that most ppl don't know anything about science and evolution and they only criticise it because it contradicts with their faith!!.... just like how the middle ages church did to ppl like Galileo!!.... this is something not acceptable in the 21st century...... like totally unacceptable and I urge the scientists around the world to have 0% tolerance against these ppl.
intelligent design is just a good example of how ppl think about science..... and how faith can interfere in science and makes us think irrationally!!
cheers
LostParadise wrote: just like how the middle ages church did to ppl like Galileo!!....
just like how the middle ages church did to ppl like Galileo!!....
ra7mato allahi 3leh
Quote LP: there are like millions of really strong scientific evidences to support evolution, but not a single scientific evidence to say anything about creation.... moreover.... evolution explains like 99.99% of everything, while creation explains absolutely nothing.... ie: 0%!!!You are dreaming, please give me this evidence, I know only of thousands missing links and confusion…the problem is that most ppl don't know anything about science and evolution and they only criticise it because it contradicts with their faith!!.... just like how the middle ages church did to ppl like Galileo!!.... this is something not acceptable in the 21st century...... like totally unacceptable and I urge the scientists around the world to have 0% tolerance against these ppl.The more science advance, the more dubious this theory becomes! And your zeal and 0% tolerance against people that don’t share these views smell religious …Quote: just like how the middle ages church did to ppl like Galileo!!....
Jedidiah777 wrote:You are dreaming, please give me this evidence, I know only of thousands missing links and confusion…The more science advance, the more dubious this theory becomes! And your zeal and 0% tolerance against people that don’t share these views smell religious …
You are dreaming, please give me this evidence, I know only of thousands missing links and confusion…The more science advance, the more dubious this theory becomes! And your zeal and 0% tolerance against people that don’t share these views smell religious …
Jedidiah777 wrote: !
!
dreaming?!
ok..... have some fun
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NaEj3g5GOYA
Well, there are a lot of scientists out there with good qualifications that don’t agree with evolution. Evolution is a very complex construct of ideas that has evolved into a philosophy or world view. (that is the only thing that has evolved) One who believes in evolution or creation can’t be a master of all these science fields involved, because it is so complex. I agree with you stalwart: As I view evolution I was wrong using the word “theory”, when looking at the word’s definition. Sorry about that. Evolution can’t be defined as theory, because it’s based on allegation/claims/assertions.
Evolution misuses science to make it look scientific, with lack of proof. Until now there are just question marks and more question marks. Unless there are facts all is speculation and thus not science. Biology, astronomy, biogenetic, mathematic, physics etc are sciences and evolution tries to explain a world view with these sciences, but by no means is evolution a biological fact. For the evidence of creation around us eternity would not yield enough time to produce it! Just consider a brain, an eye, organs and even the complexity of one little cell means troubles for evolution. You need faith in order to believe that all has evolved.The fact that evolution made it into school books doesn’t proof it correct. (check out some older school books with evolution in it, it’s a crime, what was spread) and just check out school books in different countries about history, politics etc, it all depends how people want to believe. And even if a majority believes in something: being right and winning a debate has nothing to do with each other.
I am very excited by all the findings science discover, it gives me conformation that there is a creator! I am a simply person and have not a Master or Ph.D, but this does not mean that I have to swallow everything what people teach about evolution and call it science. I consider evolution a very disputable philosophy and not science.
There are thousands of objections to evolution, some we discussed. (about missing links: there should be at least some animals to be found to show transition. And still a fact: no chance to reproduce within different kinds). Generally in evolution thousands of impossibilities are ignored or explained away without giving facts. And I don't see how Molecular Biology gives undisputable evidence to support evolution. Yes, I am not a scientist and my opinion doesn't count in this aspect, but there are other scientists in these fields out there, who dispute and oppose this strongly.I have thousands of questions (but thanks for the offer that I could ask, also appreciate that you shared your view in a kind way and thanks for the recommendation of these books, if I find time, I will read them), but would not turn to evolution for an answer, cuz I know they have millions of questions...
…and something else, it’s good to search and ask, but the frightening question: what mankind does with knowledge? It can be a very dangerous issue, especially when people believe they don’t need to give account to their Maker. There are also other questions involved in this issue among scientists, whether one supports evolution or not, like peer pressure, funding, conformity and finding a job...
Jedidiah777 wrote:!
sure....
u just remind me about the great study of Prof. Zaghlol Najar in which he proved that Meca is the centre of the earth (and maybe the universe.... not sure about this bit) hehe
I would say.... give urself a break and keep ur faith with u..... me myself totally respect ur faith (no matter what that faith is), but please..... please...... if it happens and science says something that may contradicts with ur believe and faith.... just let it go..... as if u didn't hear or read about it..... this way.... we can develop our world (by means of science) in order to build better future to our children knowing that we have already reached 6.2 billions.... so we need to develop our world.... invent and create.... inorder to survive and the only way to develop ourselves is science....... faith wont feed my children and grand children after all!.... so stop the war against science!!
cheers!
Jedidiah777 wrote:Watch out, when they talk about building a better world without God, we are talking about a great mess. But this of course will lead to another subject...
I know about something called "murals"...... this value will keep our society away from the great mess ur talking about..... murals now is a big subject in universities and schools!